Krawcheck, a former Bank of America exec, told us a couple weeks ago that she also sees similarities between Silicon Valley today and what Wall...”
He told Howard Stern, “The public wanted more. But, Howard, the public is NOT in show business. So you should do the OPPOSITE of what the public...”
O’Death - Wrong Time
New album coming in the fall, and I have the sneaking suspicion that it’s gonna be a good one.
In the earliest iterations of enterprise business software, the idea of customizing apps was something of a...
So where does one get leads? That is where I left off last time in the series. It is critical topic to cover as we delve further into the sales process. Because it is such a big topic though, it is best to tackle it by breaking down the parts. People often just refer to leads, but that obscures the full picture. It is more than just the lead itself; it is the process of finding leads, properly identifying leads, and knowing how to handle leads.
When the topic of leads comes up, most non-sales people picture the movie Glengarry Glen Ross and Alec Baldwin waving a bunch of index cards in the air. I have personally worked with customers in the not so distant past where the process was not too dissimilar. The way sales often worked involved buying lead lists of dubious quality, scouring phone books, or even going door-to-door.
Obviously the situation has improved immensely with the Internet and more sound and proven marketing practices. However, the mechanics around leads are not all that different. There are three components to consider when discussing leads:
Why is it important to make such distinctions? Because it helps us to think strategically about lead generation. It is far easier to simply think in terms of quick wins and near-term tactics. While the ability to be flexible and change gears quickly is beneficial for startups, it can backfire because it results in disjointed efforts that waste precious time and money. Often this becomes an issue with startups that are lured into dubious events, programs, and the like that offer very little in the way of relevant leads but often end up costing a bundle. Without a strategic marketing vision, it is easy to fall into these traps. That includes the seemingly “good programs” that are supported more by myth and “sound wisdom” than actual results.
I am here to tell you that I haven’t a clue which method is best for you because it depends on your business, your industry, and your solution. Anyone that tells you otherwise is a charlatan. The best ways of acquiring leads depends on what works for you at your particular stage of growth or strategic direction. All I can tell you are the programs and methods to avoid because time and time again they have proven to be of low value. The only way to know the “best” methods is to test and measure, test and measure, and repeat that over and over again. Thus, this exercise of separating out acquisition, source, and execution is simply a means to help lead us to that test and measure mentality.
I will probe more into details of each over the next several days, but for now I have provided the above chart to help list out just some of those acquisition tactics, sources, and execution methods. It is simply illustrative and some things may meld into each other as I touch upon earlier, but hopefully this helps you to start thinking strategically about your own lead generation process and how you will measure effectiveness. Remember, a large part of this exercise is to improve upon what you are doing and as the saying goes, if you cannot measure it, you cannot improve it.