On sale now. Be the hipster in your Datacenter.
On The Road - Houndmouth
This Louisville group is coming out with their first full length in June. I really like what I’ve heard so far from them.
summer has begun
Dinner under a clear blue sky at GoogaMooga in Prospect Park last night.
Friday on Flickr.
I had a discussion the other night with an entrepreneur about whether to include specific deal terms in the pitch deck or investor meetings. Unfortunately, there is a lot of contradictory advice on this subject. On the one hand some say that investors want everything laid out clearly, but on the other some say that investors do not care. I believe the best approach is to take the middle of the road so as to increase the chances of garnering serious interest and commitments.

Investors all have particular preferences and you are not going to hit the hot buttons on every introduction. There will also be plenty of times where you unwittingly hit some of the wrong buttons. As mind-reading is not a skill that has yet developed in mankind, your job is to be thorough enough with the information while leaving yourself plenty of openings and flexibility to maneuver.
On a tangent, it is also important to note that some investors are simply not worth pursuing. If the information requests start to border on ridiculous, move on. An investor that gets caught up in the minute of what is on certain slides and nitpicking on specific terms is either not really excited about you, your team and your idea or they are a noob investor. Either way, you are spinning your wheels and wasting precious time that can be spent on experienced investors that show genuine excitement for your startup.
There are seven main points to consider when talking about the structure of the deal:
The best way to organize this information is to think of three buckets; what you are asking for, what your funding process is, and why you are asking. In this way, you can structure the conversation and presentation accordingly.
Most recommendations seem to state that you should not include much information, particularly when it comes to terms and use of proceeds, but there is little downside of including this. By not including some details and specifics, you lose the investors that yearn for details, while the investors that do not care will just bypass the adding data. If you are concerned about offending one camp over the other, you can build your pitch deck in such a way to include highlight of the three buckets in one slide, then make reference to a detailed set of slides in the appendix.
The last bit of advice would be to keep it simple and stick as closely to standard terms and deal structures. Experienced investors are familiar with the standard terms and will be better able to evaluate your deal focusing on more important things like your team, the product, traction, and the market opportunity. Also by keeping it simple and standard, you are leaving the conversation open to suggestions and modifications that might be important to certain investors such as pari passu rights, participating preferred shares or board seat representation.