Strong Opinions @marksbirch

Random thoughts from a NYC entrepreneur and investor about start-ups, technology and the people that make it all happen. Also find time for good tunes and good food.
Recent Tweets @
Posts I Like
Posts tagged "policy"

Court Tosses FCC’s ‘Net Neutrality’ Rules" via The Wall Street Journal

Heh, heh….”traffic jammers”.  Yes, they use plenty of bandwidth but let’s face it, without these companies and many others offering content (WSJ included), there is no Internet worth using.  Remember the days when the telcos offered their own content stores?  Shudder to think…

In 1978, the United States had 307,000 inmates in state and federal prisons. That soared to a peak of more than 1.6 million in 2009. Since then, the number of inmates has declined for three consecutive years to 1.57 million in 2012. The number of juveniles detained has also begun to drop since peaking in 2000, although the U.S. still detains children at a rate five times that of the next highest country.

Help Thy Neighbor and Go Straight to Prison" via The New York Times

Also noteworthy in the article ”With less than 5 percent of the world’s population, the United States has almost one-quarter of the world’s prisoners.”

And…

"California devotes $179,400 to keep a juvenile in detention for a year, and spends less than $10,000 per student in its schools."

What are we doing America?

As we Americans watch our parades and fire up our grills this 4 July, the 237th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence – the seminal document of the United States – we should take the time to ask ourselves some related questions: how did we come to this state of mind and behavior? How did we become so fearful and timid that we’ve given away essential liberties? Do we realize what we’re giving up? What would the nation’s founders think of us?

via AlterNet

Certainly something we should all keep in mind.  Do we know exactly what we are giving up in the name of security?

Let me show you what this congressperson [Rep. Steve King] is doing. Basically they’re pinning the problems that we have in this country on people who are poor. If you think about people who are poor really— you have 80 percent of people who are food insecure are actually working. That means their wages are so low that they’re eligible for food stamps. So you want to talk about dependency in this country? Let’s talk about corporations and businesses that pay such low wages that they depend on the United States government to add money to those wages through the Income Assistance Programs, like SNAP. So because if you take a company like Walmart, pays their workers so low that their workers are actually eligible for food stamps. Who’s dependent on the U.S. government? I’d have to say it’s Walmart is the welfare queen here.

Mariana Chilton (via azspot)

Can we officially declare this the War on the Poor?  Now they want to attack access to food.

(via rafer)

The omnibus bill, which arrived on the full Senate floor this week after intense negotiations in the Judiciary Committee, contains several provisions directed specifically at the technology sector. It makes it easier for foreign students who get science and engineering degrees at American universities to get permanent residency, creates a new temporary visa for entrepreneurs, and in the most contested clause, vastly expands how many temporary contract workers can be brought into this country under so-called H-1B visas, while also raising the minimum wages they must be paid.
Many businesses agree to settle because the cost of fighting the charges in court would be so high. One Boston University study found that patent trolls cost businesses $29 billion in 2011 alone.

"White House to act against patent trolls" via TheHill

Not that I expect any substantive change anytime soon, but at least this issue is still circulating around Congress.

There are other forces at work that are a lot stronger (than Immigration Reform). Graduate students from places like India and China are returning to their home countries in far greater numbers not only because we have made it harder to stay post 9/11 but also because those countries have rapidly growing domestic economies which offer a lot of opportunity.

Albert nails an important subtly which seems underrepresented in the current conversation on Immigration Reform. (via brycedotvc)

Have to disagree here.  Not with the fact that those foreign graduate students are going back to their home countries.  That is indeed a trend that has been in the works for the past decade.  They are going back to economies that have improved significantly in that time, providing an incentive for those talented students to return home.

What I disagree with is that there is still a significant gap between an opportunity in the US and an opportunity in other countries.  I have spoken with many entrepreneurs, some of whom are close friends, and they have expressed deep frustrations with the cultural and regulatory roadblocks to entrepreneurship in their home countries.  So yes, there are opportunities, but the barrier to entry is still much steeper there than in the US.  If we get immigration reform passed now, we have a chance to convince these talented individuals to return to the US.

United Guns of America Part II

A few weeks after the Aurora, Colorado shootings, I wrote about the entwined nature of guns and America.  While I support strong gun control measures, many in the US do not, and historically, unfettered guns ownership has enjoyed significant public support.  Back in August, I concluded with the following:

The reality is that gun ownership will forever be a part of America’s history, now and into the future.  Public sentiment still supports the Second Amendment and comprehensive gun control is simply too politically radioactive for any politician to touch.

We are now experiencing yet another mass shooting.  Sadly however I doubt that this tragedy will do much to sway public perception on gun control.  To ban or heavily restrict guns would be deemed un-American in the eyes of many, include those that personally revile guns.  Gun control offends our American belief of freedom as ingrained in our psyche as freedom of speech and freedom of religion.

Maybe then we should not be calling it “gun control” then.  When people are asked about specific policy such as checking backgrounds, restricting access to certain groups, or banning specific types of weapons, then support is strong across the board, including from many NRA members.  While I still harbor doubts of meaningful action taking place to advance gun control in the near-term, there are ways that we can enact sensible legislation if Congress shows leadership on this issue.

With all the carnage from gun violence in our country, it’s still almost impossible to believe that a mass shooting in a kindergarten class could happen. It has come to that. Not even kindergarteners learning their A,B,Cs are safe. We heard after Columbine that it was too soon to talk about gun laws. We heard it after Virginia Tech. After Tucson and Aurora and Oak Creek. And now we are hearing it again. For every day we wait, 34 more people are murdered with guns. Today, many of them were five-year olds. President Obama rightly sent his heartfelt condolences to the families in Newtown. But the country needs him to send a bill to Congress to fix this problem. Calling for ‘meaningful action’ is not enough. We need immediate action. We have heard all the rhetoric before. What we have not seen is leadership — not from the White House and not from Congress. That must end today. This is a national tragedy and it demands a national response. My deepest sympathies are with the families of all those affected, and my determination to stop this madness is stronger than ever.

courtenaybird:

America to immigrants: ‘Give me your tired, your poor’ but keep your entrepreneurs

From 1995 to 2005, 25.3% of all technology and engineering startups nationwide and 52.4% of those in Silicon Valley were founded by immigrants. More than a decade earlier, from 1980 to 1998, Saxenian had documented that the key immigrant-founding groups, Indian and Chinese, had founded 24% of the Valley’s startups. This means there was a very positive trend of growing immigrant entrepreneurship.

Our earlier research had documented that, on average, immigrant founders started their companies 13 years after entering the U.S., and they typically came here to study or work. In the late 90s and early 2000s there was an influx of skilled workers in response to the Y2K crisis and a booming tech economy. The U.S. boosted the number of H-1B visas issued from 65,000 to about 200,000 for several years. Given this, the United States should have a greater increase in immigrant entrepreneurship. But this hasn’t happened.

…The proportion of immigrant-founded companies nationwide has dropped from 25.3 to 24.3%. In Silicon Valley, this is down from 52.4% to 43.9%.

(via Vivek Wadhwa)

America continues to implement the most ass-backwards immigration policies.  We bemoan the fact that jobs get shipped overseas yet do everything to prevent more businesses (and thus more jobs) from launching right here in the US.  One of America’s greatest virtues was as a land of hope and opportunity for those that were economically and politically depressed.  The resulting mass of immigrants was the engine that fueled America’s global ascendancy due in no small part by the brainpower and talent that was drawn by the opportunities here.